查看: 32996|回复: 3

Back in court 堕胎争议重回法庭

发表于 2015-12-1 11:24:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

Abortion in America

Back in court

It may poison the 2016 election, but the Supreme Court should strike down Texas’s restrictive abortion law

Nov 21st 2015 | From the print edition

AS IF next year’s presidential election were not shaping up to be contentious enough, the Supreme Court has picked 2016 to issue its most consequential ruling on abortion in 20 years. This will add fresh impetus to a cultural battle that has raged, unresolved, on America’s national stage for almost half a century. That is regrettable. It is also necessary.


At issue is whether a law passed by the Texas legislature called HB2 is constitutional. The state has piled regulations on abortion clinics with the aim (so far rather successful) of closing them down. The number of such clinics in the state has dropped from 41 in 2012 to 18 at the last count. If the court rules next year that HB2 is constitutional, that number will shrink further. Other states keen to restrict legal access to abortion would follow suit. Already there are four that have only one clinic for the whole state, making the legal termination of a pregnancy a right that exists in theory but not in practice.


A clear majority of Americans have, for decades, told pollsters that abortion should be legal in most cases. More recently, a narrower majority has emerged for outlawing abortion after 20 weeks, with some exceptions. That position—access to abortion that is legal and unrestricted until late in the second trimester, with some restrictions thereafter—is not unlike the compromise reached in other countries.  In more secular Britain abortion is banned after 24 weeks, with exceptions in cases where to continue the pregnancy would threaten the life of the mother, or where the child is likely to be severely disabled. The Supreme Court itself has already endorsed limits after 24 weeks, the point at which a fetus is considered to be viable outside the womb, putting it squarely alongside public opinion.


The best way forward would be to pass legislation to this effect. But there is no chance of that, because the two sides are farther apart than ever, with some pro-choice groups arguing that abortion is an absolute right that cannot be restricted under any circumstances, and their pro-life opponents retorting that all abortions are acts of murder. The shift to the extremes has been most noticeable among Republicans. Marco Rubio, who currently looks a good bet to win his party’s presidential nomination, is in favour of any law that promises to reduce the number of abortions, even one without exclusions for rape or incest. In the past four years state legislatures have put in place 231 restrictions on abortions—more than in the whole of the previous decade.

最好的方式是通过立法来解决争议,但现在看来似乎不可能了,因为两极分化已经太严重,倾向于自由选择阵营的人认为堕胎一项在任何情况下都不该受限的权力,然而倾向于人权阵营的人认为任何时候的堕胎都与谋杀无异。走向极端的情况在共和党阵营的特别明显,比如Marco Rubio——极有可能赢得党内提名的总统候选人——就是一个例子,Marco Rubio赞同所有能降低堕胎率的法案,即使这样的法案并不将强奸和乱伦作为例外。在过去的四年里,州立立法机关已经通过了231条对堕胎的限制条令,这个数字超过了前十年的总和。

Bill of rights 权力的法案
To make abortion safe, legal and rare remains a good aim for America’s laws. But closing legal abortion clinics does nothing for safety, whatever the proponents of the Texan law claim. If such restrictions are adopted more widely, abortion will, in practice, become illegal in many places, leading to the return of dangerous, clandestine procedures. It will not necessarily become rarer. Whatever the law, abortions will be carried out. The appeals court which upheld HB2 earlier this year acknowledged as much when it wrote that Texans who wanted an abortion could in future drive to New Mexico. Factors other than its legality are more important in lowering the abortion rate. Between 2002 and 2011—just before some states began to pile on restrictions—America’s abortion rate dropped by 14%, largely because the rate of teenage pregnancy fell.


That nine unelected justices can do a better job of reflecting what America, in aggregate, favours than thousands of elected politicians in Washington or state capitols—as they did when ruling for gay marriage—is a painful indictment of American politics. It is nevertheless true. Despite the reaction it will provoke, the court should strike down HB2.


From the print edition: Leaders


您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册



参与人数 1原创译作 +4 译作奖励 +1 收起 理由
sparker + 4 + 1


发表于 2016-2-6 17:53:36 | 显示全部楼层
新奥尔良(New Orleans)
新墨西哥州(New Mexico)
发表于 2016-6-16 10:40:37 | 显示全部楼层
Already there are four that have only one clinic for the whole state 这句好像漏了呢,即使原本他们中的四个州都仅有一所该类诊所。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册


QQ|小黑屋|手机版|网站地图|关于我们|七月天| ECO中文网 ( 京ICP备06039041号  

GMT+8, 2018-8-20 15:24 , Processed in 0.066529 second(s), 27 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.3

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表